Trulock
& Harris - Gun
Reviews - Archive - Beretta 686 E

Beretta
686 E
This month’s test
gun is the latest in a significant re-vamping of Beretta’s range
of competition guns. It is following closely in the footsteps of the
682E, so much so that I had to look at it for a few minutes before I
realised that was not a 682E. The most obvious difference is the
shape of the forend; much more along the lines of a semi beavertail,
but with a slightly square look and feel to it. Somewhat different
to the slimmer schnabel type forend that has become the accepted
shape of forend for a sporting gun. I didn’t shoot this gun but I
did quite like the forend; I used to shoot a Browning B25 skeet gun
,which had that type of forend and so it is OK with me, but my
feeling is that most sporting shooters would rather have the slimmer
schnabel.
Beretta have also
gone back to traditional diamond chequer on this gun rather that the
laser cut type found on the new 682E. On the forend this is
patterned to give 3 panels; one big one underneath and then two
smaller ones along each side. It is perhaps this pattern
configuration that adds to the square look of the forend, though to
have the whole thing chequered would probably have made it look too
big. Also a smooth area in the pattern helps to make the feel more
comfortable and not too sharp. The chequer pattern on the stock is
in a sort of crescent shape that compliments the forend, and also
comes to the hand well. There is no palm swell which doesn't cause
problems for left handers, and also keeps the grip slim.
The action is
mechanically the same as the 686 silver pigeon, and to be fair there
is little that Beretta could do to improve this action, such is its
reliability. Though I do note that they have gone back to the
inertia version for picking up the second shot whereas the 682e
started out with a mechanical selection for the second shot.
The engraving is
far sparser on this gun, in fact it isn’t really engraving at all
but a pattern of crests that are set into the side of the action in
relief, and are quite eye catching. The gun’s model number is set
above this in gold.
The barrels follow
the Beretta mono block principle of construction. And have the
standard Beretta boring and multichoke system rather than the 682’s
new optima boring system. Obviously this helps to account for the
significant increase in price for the 682.
The ribs on the
side are ventilated to reduce weight and to keep the gun as cool as
possible. For the top rib Beretta have gone back to a type of rib
that was found on earlier 686’s; 8mm with cross hatching to
prevent glare.
The bores as with
all Beretta’s in this series have chrome lined barrels so they are
very tough wearing and also there is minimal chance of the bores
corroding unless they are particularly neglected. The barrel black
is a nice deep gloss, and adds to the gun’s good looks.
The stock and
forend are well figured and if they can maintain this standard of
woodwork there will be few complaints. Beretta’s tendency over the
last couple of years or so is to use quite light coloured wood that
doesn’t hold that much appeal for most people. But lately it has
become much better and this gun is no exception and the two pieces
match each other very well.
Beretta has however
recently started to use a new gloss type oil finish, which looks
quite good when new, although I think maybe a little too glossy; a
bit like a hair dresser’s car! But should a customer require it
can be fairly readily replaced with a more traditional subdued oil
finish.
The stock is
finished with a ¾ “ black recoil pad, which is relatively smooth
and so should not cause much snagging when shouldered.
The pistol grip is
quite comfortable and fits the hand well. The 686 silver pigeon had
become, I think, too big in the grip and stock as a whole, making it
quite bulky and heavy. But this gun sees a return to a more stream
lined stock.
[
back to top
]
|