Trulock
& Harris - Gun
Reviews - Archive - Browning B325/2

Browning B325/2
Browning
is probably the mass producer of guns with the longest association
with the OU.
It
started with the B25, which although the dream of John Moses
Browning was really the work of his son, Val. Patent applications
for the first designs appeared in 1925, but unfortunately John
Browning died in 1926 and the work was taken up by Val, with the
first guns being offered for sale in 1931.
Many
processes went into the production of a B25, perhaps a little too
much, and although today, the design has been refined, the quality
and time that it takes to build a B25, has elevated them into the
custom gun class. However, from a value for money point of view,
they are still one of the cheapest hand made guns on the market.
That
said, they are probably out of the reach of most of us. Browning,
realised this too and had to bring guns onto the market that would
appeal to a wider audience, simply in terms of affordability if
nothing else.
To
do this they turned to their friends in Japan; Miroku.
In
the early seventies, miroku had made a gun for Browning, that was
sold mainly in the USA, called the Citori.
In
the mid 80’s this was revived on the current Miroku action, which
mechanically had drawn a great deal of influence from the B25.
These
guns were quite heavy, both in action and stock, but was available
in all grades and found a good deal of favour on the market. But
although not a problem the weight was a minus point.
So
with some help from Browning UK, the gun was redesigned from a
cosmetic angle. Throughout the range, even today the mechanics have
remained unchanged, and I think that there is little that could be
done to improve it.
In
initially the gun was produced in only one grade and was introduced
to run along side the Citori range. The single grade remained as the
grade 1, and the citori range was replaced by further grades of 325.
namely grades 2, 3, 5 and 6. although I have seen a few Miroku’s
in grade 4, neither 325 or 425 range had them.
The
obvious differences between the 325 and the citori was the weight
and the stock length.
Where
the citori was about 8lb, a 325 was approx. 7 ˝ lb. This was
achieved with a much slimmer action and stock.
The
stock dimensions were noticeable longer; 14 7/8” at
centre, and
finished with a polymer heel plate, against the citori’s rubber
pad at about 14 5/8”. And it was also much slimmer at the hand
affording
better grip.
The chequer pattern was different at the time to anything else seen
at that time on a Browning; with crescents forming the borders
rather than
vees. This is still the same on the 425 . though not on
higher grades which have a more conventional pattern. The forend
wood followed the popular schnabel shape, and is still current
today.
Barrels
on the 325 followed the same method of constructio that had always
been used on a Browning or Miroku; chopper lump,where the lumps that
join the action are an integral part of the barrel tube.
The
main feature of the 425, that in effect created it as another model,
was the fact that it was the first gun Browning to be made on the
mono-block principle where the two barrel tubes are fixed into a
separate ‘lump block’.
The
first 325’s appeared on the market in 1988 and the gun ran until
superseded by the 425 in 1995.
To
start with all the guns were made with conventional bore diameter
barrels and the standard Invector choke system. In the early 90’s
a choice was then made available between standard or plus boring.
This ‘plus boring’ had started with the
GTI, which was a purpose
built clay gun for 1991. Basically this is where the bore diameters
are made bigger; 18.8mm as against 18.4mm on the standard gun. This
over-boring, as it is known, simply has the effect of reducing
pressure in the bore so that there is less recoil. Because of the
larger diameter a new invector choke system was developed, which
utilised a longer tube. Having a longr taper this was also designed
to reduce recoil, and became known as invector plus.
Problems.
None
that I would say are particular to the 325 range; any Browning/
miroku built over the last 20 years or so could suffer from them,
and it is true to say that the older they get, having done more
work, then so problems are more likely to show up.
Top
lever springs can become weak; this may cause the lever to jump when
the gun is fired and block the second barrel from firing. This is a
safety device coming into play.
It
could be that the top lever spring retaining assembly has come
loose; it screws into place. And simply may need tightening up. Or
it could be that the gun is loose and needs to be tightened in the
action. Depending on the amount of movement between action and
barrel, the locking bolt could be built up and reshaped, or a new
bolt fitted.
Misfiring
could be down to a badly pitted striker nose; this is more prominent
on the bottom barrel, and happens surprisingly quickly, but it will
usually be a considerable amount of shooting before this manifests
itself into a misfire problem. Strikers rarely break on Brownings
Or
it could be weak mainsprings that need to be replaced.
Safe
spring will occasionally break or become weak.
Sear
lifter and the sear arms can become worn and cause trigger problems,
though a gun has to do a considerable amount of work for this to
happen.
Ejector
trip rods can break at the head and are easily replaced.
Extractors
can become worn in their slots and may allow a cartridge to get
behind them; this can be cured by fitting new extractors, but it may
be that the chamber has become through lack of gun care, and there
is little that can be done to cure this other than sleeving the
chamber, which is only cost effective on a high grade gun.
You do
need to keep a Browning very clean to keep it at its best. Thorough
cleaning after use, particularly on wet days is essential to stop
bores and chambers becoming stained and marked
[
back to top
]
|